shurkan2 schrieb:
Ah okay, but 4:2:0 is still better image quality than usual Full HD, isn't it?
They’re two different things. 4:2:0 is a value of
chroma subsampling.
FullHD, UHD, and 4K are just
video resolutions.
The difference between 4:4:4 and 4:2:0 is hardly noticable, though. Given the choice between 4:4:4 @ 30 Hz and 4:2:0 @ 60 Hz, I’d always choose the latter. Only choose 4:4:4 if you plan on really colour-sensitive photo/video editing.
shurkan2 schrieb:
But can the mainboard decide which graphics card will handle the output to the hdmi port? I don't want to buy a monitor and might have to send it back again
Sorry, there’s just no way to tell by the manual and data given on Acer’s site alone. :I The reasonable thing to do for Acer’s engineers would be to connect the HDMI output to the 1050 Ti. It’s just that these guys don’t always do what’s reasonable but mostly what’s cheaper. So …
shurkan2 schrieb:
This might be interesting. Its the system settings of my NVIDEA graphics card. According to the images it looks to me, that the hdmi port is connected to the 1050 Ti.
Given the phsysical form of both outputs, yeah, sure looks like it.
shurkan2 schrieb:
I just got the idea to connect an old full HD monitor and got the following information. So that would mean I can use any 4K monitor also with 4:4:4, correct?
Unfortunately not. The information displayed for this monitor doesn’t say anything about the chroma subsampling or refresh rate when used with 3840 × 2160.
Try setting the refresh rate of this monitor to 30 Hz just so you know what it feels and looks like. It’s considered to be awkward and disgusting for most computer work but if you’re okay with it, go for it and use it with 4:4:4.
As mentioned above, do yourself a favour and try with a 4K TV beforehand. Better to be safe than sorry.