Woraus schließt du das?
Hier kommen sie zu einem anderen, differenzierteren Schluss: https://www.hwcooling.net/en/arctic-p12-pro-key-to-noiselessness-is-in-7-blades-review/43/
Ansonsten kommt es dem Test nach auf das Szenario an, ob sie besser oder schlechter performen:
Hier kommen sie zu einem anderen, differenzierteren Schluss: https://www.hwcooling.net/en/arctic-p12-pro-key-to-noiselessness-is-in-7-blades-review/43/
Shortening the blades also helped eliminate unwanted vibrations and tonal peaks, which many users saw as the biggest drawback of the older five-blade design. Vibrations here are consistently low, and in some modes (such as the one corresponding to “39 dBA” in our tests, around 1330 RPM for the P12 Pro fan) they’re dramatically reduced. This also results in a significant drop in noise at lower sound frequencies, which the P12 fans struggled with around 100 Hz. The new P12 Pro models no longer suffer from this—at least not as noticeably. We can even confidently say that the acoustic signature of the P12 Pro is no longer characterized as boomy; instead, the sound of these fans is quite pleasant. And this applies across the entire speed range.
Ansonsten kommt es dem Test nach auf das Szenario an, ob sie besser oder schlechter performen:
So the P12 Pro doesn’t surpass the P12 in every respect, and there are a few exceptions—demonstrating just how good the P12 fans were (or still are, while they’re available…), as shown by their performance on a grill or with a plastic filter. Still, it’s fair to say that the P12 Pro models are the overall “better” choice—especially for radiators.
Zuletzt bearbeitet:
