AMD Piledriver vs. Bulldozer: Vorschau auf AMDs Vishera
A16/32x264 HD Benchmark 4.0 & 5.0
x264 HD Benchmark | |
---|---|
Screenshots | |
Version | 4.0 |
Benchmarkart | zwei integrierte Tests |
Codec | x264 |
Download | x264 HD Benchmark |
x264 HD Benchmark 4.0
-
Test 1:
- AMD Phenom II X4 965, 4C/4T, 3,4 GHz, 45 nm113,80
- AMD A8-3870K, 4C/4T, 3,00 GHz, 32 nm108,37
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T, 4,20 GHz, 32 nm, Turbo106,98
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T, 3,80 GHz, 32 nm, Turbo104,77
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T, 3,80 GHz, 32 nm101,89
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T @ 3,80 GHz, 32 nm98,23
- AMD A6-3650, 4C/4T, 2,60 GHz, 32 nm95,48
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T @ 3,00 GHz, 32 nm82,24
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T @ 3,00 GHz, 32 nm78,93
-
Test 2:
- AMD Phenom II X4 965, 4C/4T, 3,4 GHz, 45 nm23,23
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T, 4,20 GHz, 32 nm, Turbo22,58
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T, 3,80 GHz, 32 nm, Turbo22,09
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T, 3,80 GHz, 32 nm21,43
- AMD A8-3870K, 4C/4T, 3,00 GHz, 32 nm20,99
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T @ 3,80 GHz, 32 nm20,50
- AMD A6-3650, 4C/4T, 2,60 GHz, 32 nm18,32
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T @ 3,00 GHz, 32 nm17,10
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T @ 3,00 GHz, 32 nm16,17
Einheit: Bilder pro Sekunde (FPS)
x264 HD Benchmark 5.0.1
-
Test 1:
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T, 3,80 GHz, 32 nm, Turbo28,9
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T, 4,20 GHz, 32 nm, Turbo28,9
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T, 3,80 GHz, 32 nm27,4
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T @ 3,80 GHz, 32 nm26,3
- AMD A8-3870K, 4C/4T, 3,00 GHz, 32 nm24,2
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T @ 3,00 GHz, 32 nm22,1
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T @ 3,00 GHz, 32 nm21,1
-
Test 2:
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T, 4,20 GHz, 32 nm, Turbo7,9
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T, 3,80 GHz, 32 nm, Turbo7,7
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T, 3,80 GHz, 32 nm7,5
- AMD A8-3870K, 4C/4T, 3,00 GHz, 32 nm7,5
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T @ 3,80 GHz, 32 nm7,1
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T @ 3,00 GHz, 32 nm6,0
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T @ 3,00 GHz, 32 nm5,7
Einheit: Punkte