AMD Piledriver vs. Bulldozer: Vorschau auf AMDs Vishera
A16/32x264 HD Benchmark 4.0 & 5.0
x264 HD Benchmark | |
---|---|
Screenshots | |
Version | 4.0 |
Benchmarkart | zwei integrierte Tests |
Codec | x264 |
Download | x264 HD Benchmark |
x264 HD Benchmark 4.0
Einheit: Bilder pro Sekunde (FPS)
-
Test 1:
- AMD Phenom II X4 965, 4C/4T, 3,4 GHz, 45 nm
- AMD A8-3870K, 4C/4T, 3,00 GHz, 32 nm
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T, 4,20 GHz, 32 nm, Turbo
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T, 3,80 GHz, 32 nm, Turbo
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T, 3,80 GHz, 32 nm
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T @ 3,80 GHz, 32 nm
- AMD A6-3650, 4C/4T, 2,60 GHz, 32 nm
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T @ 3,00 GHz, 32 nm
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T @ 3,00 GHz, 32 nm
-
Test 2:
- AMD Phenom II X4 965, 4C/4T, 3,4 GHz, 45 nm
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T, 4,20 GHz, 32 nm, Turbo
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T, 3,80 GHz, 32 nm, Turbo
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T, 3,80 GHz, 32 nm
- AMD A8-3870K, 4C/4T, 3,00 GHz, 32 nm
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T @ 3,80 GHz, 32 nm
- AMD A6-3650, 4C/4T, 2,60 GHz, 32 nm
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T @ 3,00 GHz, 32 nm
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T @ 3,00 GHz, 32 nm
x264 HD Benchmark 5.0.1
Einheit: Punkte
-
Test 1:
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T, 3,80 GHz, 32 nm, Turbo
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T, 4,20 GHz, 32 nm, Turbo
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T, 3,80 GHz, 32 nm
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T @ 3,80 GHz, 32 nm
- AMD A8-3870K, 4C/4T, 3,00 GHz, 32 nm
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T @ 3,00 GHz, 32 nm
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T @ 3,00 GHz, 32 nm
-
Test 2:
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T, 4,20 GHz, 32 nm, Turbo
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T, 3,80 GHz, 32 nm, Turbo
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T, 3,80 GHz, 32 nm
- AMD A8-3870K, 4C/4T, 3,00 GHz, 32 nm
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T @ 3,80 GHz, 32 nm
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T @ 3,00 GHz, 32 nm
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T @ 3,00 GHz, 32 nm
Auf der nächsten Seite: Spiele (geringe Auflösung)