AMD Piledriver vs. Bulldozer: Vorschau auf AMDs Vishera

A16/32

12.10.2012 17:00 Uhr Volker Rißka

x264 HD Benchmark 4.0 & 5.0

x264 HD Benchmark

x264 HD Benchmark

x264 HD Benchmark 4.0

Test 1:
- AMD Phenom II X4 965, 4C/4T, 3,4 GHz, 45 nm
  113,80
- AMD A8-3870K, 4C/4T, 3,00 GHz, 32 nm
  108,37
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T, 4,20 GHz, 32 nm, Turbo
  106,98
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T, 3,80 GHz, 32 nm, Turbo
  104,77
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T, 3,80 GHz, 32 nm
  101,89
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T @ 3,80 GHz, 32 nm
  98,23
- AMD A6-3650, 4C/4T, 2,60 GHz, 32 nm
  95,48
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T @ 3,00 GHz, 32 nm
  82,24
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T @ 3,00 GHz, 32 nm
  78,93
Test 2:
- AMD Phenom II X4 965, 4C/4T, 3,4 GHz, 45 nm
  23,23
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T, 4,20 GHz, 32 nm, Turbo
  22,58
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T, 3,80 GHz, 32 nm, Turbo
  22,09
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T, 3,80 GHz, 32 nm
  21,43
- AMD A8-3870K, 4C/4T, 3,00 GHz, 32 nm
  20,99
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T @ 3,80 GHz, 32 nm
  20,50
- AMD A6-3650, 4C/4T, 2,60 GHz, 32 nm
  18,32
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T @ 3,00 GHz, 32 nm
  17,10
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T @ 3,00 GHz, 32 nm
  16,17

Einheit: Bilder pro Sekunde (FPS)

x264 HD Benchmark 5.0.1

Test 1:
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T, 3,80 GHz, 32 nm, Turbo
  28,9
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T, 4,20 GHz, 32 nm, Turbo
  28,9
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T, 3,80 GHz, 32 nm
  27,4
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T @ 3,80 GHz, 32 nm
  26,3
- AMD A8-3870K, 4C/4T, 3,00 GHz, 32 nm
  24,2
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T @ 3,00 GHz, 32 nm
  22,1
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T @ 3,00 GHz, 32 nm
  21,1
Test 2:
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T, 4,20 GHz, 32 nm, Turbo
  7,9
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T, 3,80 GHz, 32 nm, Turbo
  7,7
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T, 3,80 GHz, 32 nm
  7,5
- AMD A8-3870K, 4C/4T, 3,00 GHz, 32 nm
  7,5
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T @ 3,80 GHz, 32 nm
  7,1
- AMD A10-5800K, 2M/4T @ 3,00 GHz, 32 nm
  6,0
- AMD FX-4170, 2M/4T @ 3,00 GHz, 32 nm
  5,7

Einheit: Punkte